Insult

This time we are looking on the crossword puzzle clue for: Insult.
it’s A 6 letters crossword definition.
Next time when searching the web for a clue, try using the search term “Insult crossword” or “Insult crossword clue” when searching for help with your puzzles. Below you will find the possible answers for Insult.

We hope you found what you needed!
If you are still unsure with some definitions, don’t hesitate to search them here with our crossword puzzle solver.

Possible Answers:

OFFEND.

Last seen on: –Eugene Sheffer – King Feature Syndicate Crossword – Jun 22 2022
Wall Street Journal Crossword – June 17 2022 – Water You Looking For?
USA Today Crossword – Feb 3 2022
USA Today Crossword – Jan 3 2022
Eugene Sheffer – King Feature Syndicate Crossword – Dec 13 2021
Eugene Sheffer – King Feature Syndicate Crossword – Apr 16 2021
Eugene Sheffer – King Feature Syndicate Crossword – Apr 12 2021
Eugene Sheffer – King Feature Syndicate Crossword – Mar 29 2021
LA Times Crossword 23 Mar 21, Tuesday
NY Times Crossword 25 Jan 21, Monday
Eugene Sheffer – King Feature Syndicate Crossword – Jan 5 2021
Universal Crossword – Mar 21 2020
Eugene Sheffer – King Feature Syndicate Crossword – Mar 7 2020
Wall Street Journal Crossword – January 18 2020 – Singular Songsters
LA Times Crossword 5 Jan 20, Sunday

Random information on the term “Insult”:

Ad hominem (Latin for “to the person”), short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. The terms ad mulierem and ad feminam have been used specifically when the person receiving the criticism is female.

Fallacious ad hominem reasoning is categorized among informal fallacies, more precisely as a genetic fallacy, a subcategory of fallacies of irrelevance.

However, the term’s original meaning was an argument “calculated to appeal to the person addressed more than to impartial reason”. Under this meaning the term does not refer to a logical fallacy. This meaning survives in philosophical usage, as explained by the philosopher R. Scott Bakker: “Classical Pyrrhonians argued ad hominem, not in the sense of the logical fallacy of that name, but in the sense that their dialectical strategy necessitates the exclusive utilization of the beliefs, convictions, and assumptions of their interlocutors. In other words, they construct their arguments on the basis of what other people hold to be true.”

Insult on Wikipedia