Pigpen
This time we are looking on the crossword puzzle clue for: Pigpen.
it’s A 6 letters crossword definition.
Next time when searching the web for a clue, try using the search term “Pigpen crossword” or “Pigpen crossword clue” when searching for help with your puzzles. Below you will find the possible answers for Pigpen.
We hope you found what you needed!
If you are still unsure with some definitions, don’t hesitate to search them here with our crossword puzzle solver.
Possible Answers:
Sty.
Last seen on: –Daily Boston Globe Crossword Answers Sunday, March 26, 2023
–NewsDay Crossword January 3 2023
–L.A. Times Daily Crossword – Dec 5 2022
–Universal Crossword – Aug 8 2022 s
–Thomas Joseph – King Feature Syndicate Crossword – Jul 25 2022
–L.A. Times Daily Crossword – Jun 27 2022
–Universal Crossword – May 22 2022 s
–Newsday.com Crossword – Apr 25 2022 Crossword Answers
–USA Today Crossword – Dec 4 2021
–Universal Crossword – Dec 1 2021
–Universal Crossword – Oct 5 2021
–NY Times Crossword 29 Aug 21, Sunday
–USA Today Crossword – Dec 21 2020
–Universal Crossword – Jun 19 2020
–The Telegraph – QUICK CROSSWORD NO: 29,376 – May 29 2020
–Newsday.com Crossword – May 25 2020
–Newsday.com Crossword – Feb 24 2020
Daily Celebrity Crossword – 6/11/19 TV Tuesday
Random information on the term “Pigpen”:
Aldred’s Case (1610) 9 Co Rep 57b; (1610) 77 ER 816, [1558-1774] All ER Rep 622, is an English land law and tort law case on nuisance. The case can be seen as the birth of the ordinary man having a cause of action in certain types of environmental law against his immediate neighbour. The case confirmed a legal right to abate relatively extreme noise and smell, provided it cannot be justified as being protected by way of an easement have arisen such as from the passing of time (an easement by prescription) or custom on the piece of land in question.
The judge recited the separate law, in an obiter dictum in an old Latin maxim in the English common law, that there is no right to a view.
William Aldred claimed that Thomas Benton had erected and used a pig sty too close to his house, so that the stench made his own house unbearable to live in, including the “stopping of wholesome air”.
The Court ruled that the smell of the sty was enough to deprive Aldred of his property and personal dignity and therefore a violation of his rights and his honor as it was stripped away from him, holding that a man has, “no right to maintain a structure upon his own land, which, by reason of disgusting smells, loud or unusual noises, thick smoke, noxious vapors, the jarring of machinery, or the unwarrantable collection of flies, renders the occupancy of adjoining property dangerous, intolerable, or even uncomfortable to its tenants…”
Random information on the term “Sty”:
Aldred’s Case (1610) 9 Co Rep 57b; (1610) 77 ER 816, [1558-1774] All ER Rep 622, is an English land law and tort law case on nuisance. The case can be seen as the birth of the ordinary man having a cause of action in certain types of environmental law against his immediate neighbour. The case confirmed a legal right to abate relatively extreme noise and smell, provided it cannot be justified as being protected by way of an easement have arisen such as from the passing of time (an easement by prescription) or custom on the piece of land in question.
The judge recited the separate law, in an obiter dictum in an old Latin maxim in the English common law, that there is no right to a view.
William Aldred claimed that Thomas Benton had erected and used a pig sty too close to his house, so that the stench made his own house unbearable to live in, including the “stopping of wholesome air”.
The Court ruled that the smell of the sty was enough to deprive Aldred of his property and personal dignity and therefore a violation of his rights and his honor as it was stripped away from him, holding that a man has, “no right to maintain a structure upon his own land, which, by reason of disgusting smells, loud or unusual noises, thick smoke, noxious vapors, the jarring of machinery, or the unwarrantable collection of flies, renders the occupancy of adjoining property dangerous, intolerable, or even uncomfortable to its tenants…”